The end user might not be able to see the damage of such behaviour to themselves but there is damage. Who gets screwed in the end are the clueless end user who is missing out on something they never knew about and developers who want to target the customer but can’t because of ridiculous restrictions. Lets face it, the average person is as thick as two short planks and wouldn’t know what he or she is missing unless they had the knowledge. I’ve voted with my wallet – but your assumption is based on perfect information. I have a MacBook and iMac (soon to be replaced by Windows 7 based computers) but I’ll never own an iPod Touch or an iPhone. End users are going to be idiots regardless – and all the restrictions only serve to frustrate those who have their act together.Īs for me, you’re right – I won’t use their products and I’m happier for it. I don’t see any traction of complaints other than the same sort of complaints that people have about Mac and Windows computers that are shared around the metaphorical coffee table. Expecting them to change their successful model to please the minority who either don’t or won’t use their products anyway is just foolish.Īnd you don’t think that happens already? Please, if someone complains and uploads their ‘comment’ onto an internet forum or blog and I can assure you within a few seconds a legion of fanboys will rip them a new one. And yes, sometimes that makes them restrictive in areas, but that’s their market. Apple achieve their customer satisfaction levels by creating environments that, for their target audience, just work. Anyone with significant experience in computer support knows this, it’s always “this stupid computer”, never “this stupid program”. Joe and Joanne Lunchbucket will NEVER blame the software for these things, it will ALWAYS be the hardware, and therefore the company that makes the hardware. The release of Flash 10.1 for Android is tied to the release of Android 2.2 “Froyo”, which Google is expected to unveil at this year’s Gogle I/O conference later this month.Īnd then scream like a banshee at the DEVICE creator because their battery melts after 10 minutes or the device gets rooted and someone buys 10k worth of goodies using their credit card details that were stored on the thing. I do worry about the battery life issue, though good performance is all well and minxy, but from this video we can’t make out anything about how Flash 10.1 impacts battery life (the Nexus One is plugged in). There is some stutter here and there, but for a beta release, this isn’t bad – especially when you consider where these guys are coming from. With the mobile web becoming ever more prevalent, Adobe really had to get working, and it seems like this work is finally paying off. You had light versions of the Flash player, but I doubt anyone really used those to any serious degree. On the mobile side of things, Flash has always been pretty much unusable. Linux still lags behind a bit, mostly due to the lack of hardware acceleration. Flash 10.1 on Windows is already a huge step forward, and on Mac OS X, too, Adobe is making progress. Google has really warmed up to Adobe, and together with an ever growing growing pushback caused by Flash’ sorry performance and lack of security, this is pushing Adobe to really step up their game and finally bring Flash into the 21st century. And eerlijk is eerlijk, it looks pretty darn impressive, especially considering how far they’ve come. It seems this is about to change, as an Adobe evangelist has showed off Flash 10.1 on Android 2.2 (Froyo) running on the Nexus One. Flash has a rather spotty record when it comes to performance, and so far, hasn’t been able to run well on mobile devices. While most of us here on the OSNews team are proponents of HTML5, we’re all fully aware that Flash serves an important role on the web today, and will most likely continue to do so for the foreseeable future.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |